Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Higher Education in A Chaste Maid

The Norton’s introduction to this play proposes that “the play’s look at education in Cambridge, seen from a London perspective, suggests that it amounts to exactly nothing.” Is this really what Middleton means to express through his ridicule of Tim’s self-promotion as a scholar? Is higher education mocked here, or is the blame on the “scholar” who seeks to learn only for self-aggrandizement? Going further, does the Tim plot as a whole have a greater function in the play? If Middleton does, in fact, intend to reveal that higher education fails to deliver what it promises, is it possible/useful to see this idea as parallel to the play’s mockery of “failed” religious practices (as expressed through the failure of Lent to regulate the consumption of meat, etc.)?

1 comment:

John Y. said...

But Tim, to my mind, does not particularly stand out in this rogues' gallery. I mean, against whom would he look unfavorable (excepting Touchwood, Jr. and his bride). I think it would also be useful to look at how different the Oxford/Cambridge model is to the Continental models of higher education. Even today, some historians have criticized the "don" English system and its implications, preferring the German "professorial" system. Do you think that would alter what Middleton is saying more generally about higher education and its faults?